# FILE NAME: 00000592.soc
# TITLE: Should we renationalise the electricity network? [85b3d90cec5e8d2c51c991a4ddd8cd75]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 5
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - In general, the group was in favour of renationalising the electricity network. The general feeling was that it would lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth and help to tackle the fuel crisis. There was some opposition to the idea, citing the potential for inefficiency in government and the additional cost of more civil servants. However, the group in general thought that the government would be able to manage the sector better than private companies, who are only interested in profit.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - In general, the group was in favour of renationalising the electricity network. The general feeling was that it would lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth and help to tackle the fuel crisis. There was some opposition to the idea, citing the potential for inefficiency in government and the additional cost of more civil servants. However, the group in general thought that the government would be able to manage the sector better than private companies, who are only interested in profit.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - “Renationalising the electricity network is a good idea. The private companies are making huge profits from the public. The Government can manage it in a better way by providing relief to the public in general. The renationalise will help the public to get cheaper electricity compared to the private companies whose only motive is to make profits out of the public money. In this way we can break the cartel made by those greedy private owners.”
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - In general, the group was in favour of renationalising the electricity network. The general feeling was that it would lead to a more equitable distribution of wealth and help to tackle the fuel crisis. There was some opposition to the idea, citing the potential for inefficiency in government and the additional cost of more civil servants. However, the group in general thought that the government would be able to manage the sector better than private companies, who are only interested in profit.
1: 4,1,3,2
1: 4,1,2,3
1: 1,3,2,4
1: 3,2,1,4
1: 1,2,4,3